Natwerk Designs - what do you think about creative design?

what do you think about creative design?

personally i think its a load of crap. if you can find me some real experiments, experiments that aren't filled with lies or 'christian sin' then show me! any evidence that suggests the world is 6,000 years old done by someone that isn't misled? according to science: chance of god existing = 0 chance of evolution = >0 from my perspective attacking science shows LACK of faith. if someone was truely faithful science wouldn't matter, it would not need to be attacked wit hlies and 'creative design'. this really does seem like a poor attempt to convince yourself your christianity is the true path when you don't have faith... peace, one true christian.

Public Comments

It's a creative attempt to explain things, but it's really total nonsense. Intelligent design and creationism belong in mythology classes , not in science classes. I wish there were more Christians like you. Thanks.
Creative design? It's great! These two guys redid my kitchen - I've never seen guys with such an eye for color, and they... Oh... you mean intelligent design? It's crappy pseudo-science.
I think God was extremely creative in His design of this world. If I were the one making this world, I'd have stopped after the first 100 creatures ... I get bored easily though lol.
You sound like you are just trying to convince yourself of YOUR faith. Science's job isn't to prove anything, it just reveals how nature works. Saying the universe must have been "created" by someone is forgoing everything that science does. It's like saying, you already have the answers to the universe, and that is God. But humans are very new and our science is still basic. Even though we have discovered lots about the universe, the search for the truth never ends. And that truth can only be revealed by science.
I am going to take a leap and propose that you have not investigated intelligent design. My first clue is your supposition that intelligent designists think the world is 6000 years old. If you are looking at creationists specifically you will find this number belongs with them. Also, your probabilities; please cite who figured them out for you because it is quite amusing. I am a Christian and it always bothers me when someone leaps then looks back while screaming 'here comes a Christian'. I know you believe in your heart somehow you are helping, but keeping facts straight are a big part of proof and argument.
someone needs to deprogram you - you are too far gone
Are you suggesting that by believing in Creation we are "attacking science"? This is ludicrous. You're guilty of what you charge Christians with doing. If you don't believe my way then you're crazy. ~Neeva
The world and it's inhabitants turned out pretty good to be done through "Creation" by the Creator, hu? Pops
There's no connection at all between having to believe in a god in order to look upon the existence of the cosmos as kind of "miraculous," in a generic, but nonreligious manner. We can't encompass the overwhelming enormity of the entire cosmos (our brains would never be big enough), but that doesn't require some god who DID. Nature, in the course of taking its course, is always quite elegant, and needs no external mind to make it so. It's a human conceit on the grandest of scales, to think a god is essential in this process. Nature is huge, and all-encompassing. I have yet to hear of a god which isn't petty, stupid, contradictory, judgmental, and idiotic. I won't hold my breath waiting for one to come around, either. Intelligent design is just one more poorly-veiled attempt to put religion into public institutions, emphasis particularly on the schools, where they can weasel in and teach our children to believe something without our permission. That's enough, all by itself, to make it, and its promulgators, pretty slimy. And we have a president who thinks ID is just dandy. Maybe if we can find a way to make these last days of the Bush regime go by faster, it'll help. They say time flies when you're having fun, so what do y'all suggest? I'd like to spend it reading, playing the piano, and trying to concoct something wild and wonderful for dinner. Maybe some good PC games in there somewhere, too. There can be no righteousness without goofballism. That's the gospel of me. It's as worthy of belief as any other.
Is it science or scientists? Scientists can still fail to practice proper science. Scientists can still be biased. Scientists can still do crazy things like dig up the human footprints that are along side the dinosaur footprints in the Paluxy River bed (but there are lots more there). Scientists can ignore the archaelolgical evidence of dinosaurs carved into buildings before we were digging them up, or the actual carvings of dinosaurs themselves. It is intelligent to refute scientists who teach their faith in their approach to science when it doesn't make any sense. For example, if the world has been slowing down as it spins, how fast was it spinning when they claim the dinosaurs existed? If the moon has been travelling away from the earth, how close was it when some of these scientists claim the earth existed? When realizing all that is required for our brains to operate the way they do, with the spinal cord, the medulla, the reticular formation, the cerebellum, the hypothalamus, the thalamus, billions of neurons with their design alone, you would have to have an incredible amount of faith to believe no brains were involved in the creation of the brain. Their are several athiest scientists and philosophers who have changed their beliefs because of science, and realized that there is a lot more faith needed to believe in some of the theories that fly around pretending they are proven fact. One scientist started a site called: www.doesgodexist.com Just as it is good to question religion, it is also good to question scientists. http://www.bible.ca/tracks/